<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pruett, M. K.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cowan, C. P.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cowan, P. A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pruett, K. D.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lessons Learned From the Supporting Father Involvement Study: A Cross-Cultural Preventive Intervention for Low-Income Families With Young Children</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Social Service Research</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009/03/04</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Routledge</style></publisher><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">163-179</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0148-8376</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;ABSTRACT Despite the proliferation of fatherhood programs designed to promote paternal involvement and positive family outcomes, evaluations of these programs are scarce. The Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) study is a randomized clinical trial comprised of 289 low-income Spanish- and English-speaking families living in California. The evaluation design reflects a partnership stance that promotes empowerment of staff and social service agencies. This article examines lessons learned from the program&amp;#39;s first 3 years (2002?2004) from the perspectives of both evaluators and program staff. The lessons cover a broad range of areas, including communication procedures, training, staffing, recruitment/retention, clinical needs, intervention content and process, and maintaining cultural sensitivity.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><access-date><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015/09/18</style></access-date></record></records></xml>